Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs Intel H3C XG310

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs Intel H3C XG310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 40% (2175MHz vs 1550MHz)
More VRAM (20GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
5376 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Ada Generation +1022%
26.73 TFLOPS
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Nov 2020
Quadro Ada(x000A)
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
2175 MHz
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
160bit
Memory Bus
128bit
360.0GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
48
SM Count
-
6144
Shading Units
768
192
TMUs
48
80
ROPs
24
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

174.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
417.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
26.73 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
26.73 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
417.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

130W
TDP
300W
300 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
DG1
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
5 nm
Process Size
10 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
Unknown
294 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy