Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs Moore Threads MTT S1000M

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs Moore Threads MTT S1000M

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S1000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores
Moore Threads MTT S1000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 130W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Ada Generation +1205%
26.73 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S1000M
2.048 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Jul 2022
Workstation Ada
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
2175 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
160bit
Memory Bus
128bit
360.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
48
SM Count
-
6144
Shading Units
1024
192
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
64
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

139.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
417.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
64.00 GTexel/s
26.73 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.096 TFLOPS
26.73 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.048 TFLOPS
417.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
32.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

130W
TDP
35W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
Unknown
294 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net