Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA P102 101

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA P102 101

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 10GB VRAM P102 101 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 30% (2175MHz vs 1670MHz)
More VRAM (20GB vs 10GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 320.3GB/s)
2944 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Ada Generation +150%
26.73 TFLOPS
P102 101
10.69 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Jan 2018
Workstation Ada
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
1557 MHz
2175 MHz
Boost Clock
1670 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
2002 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
10GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
160bit
Memory Bus
320bit
360.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
48
SM Count
25
6144
Shading Units
3200
192
TMUs
200
64
ROPs
80
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
0 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

139.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
133.6 GPixel/s
417.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
334.0 GTexel/s
26.73 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
167.0 GFLOPS
26.73 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.69 TFLOPS
417.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
334.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

130W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
GP102
-
GPU Variant
GP102-101-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
16 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
6.1
6.8
Shader Model
6.4
© 2025 - TopCPU.net