Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon HD 4250

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon HD 4250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 6.336GB/s)
6104 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 4250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 130W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Ada Generation +55587%
26.73 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 4250
0.048 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Feb 2009
Quadro Ada(x000A)
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
2175 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
396 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
160bit
Memory Bus
64bit
360.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.336GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
48
SM Count
-
6144
Shading Units
40
192
TMUs
4
80
ROPs
4
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

174.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.376 GPixel/s
417.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.376 GTexel/s
26.73 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
26.73 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.52 GFLOPS
417.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

130W
TDP
25W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
RV620
-
GPU Variant
RV620 LE
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy