NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI300A
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 192GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 4% (2175MHz vs 2100MHz)
Lower TDP (130W vs 750W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
More VRAM (192GB vs 20GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 360.0GB/s)
13312 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
26.73 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI300A
+205%
81.72 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Dec 2023
Workstation Ada
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
2175 MHz
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
2525 MHz
Memory
20GB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM3
160bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
360.0GB/s
Bandwidth
10.3TB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
304
48
SM Count
-
6144
Shading Units
19456
192
TMUs
1216
64
ROPs
0
192
Tensor Cores
1216
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
48 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB
Theoretical Performance
139.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
417.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2554 GTexel/s
26.73 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
26.73 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
417.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS
Board Design
130W
TDP
750W
300 W
Suggested PSU
1150 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
5 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
153 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
N/A
