Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 40.00GB/s)
7040 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 110W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation +4221%
24.72 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition
0.572 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Feb 2013
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 600M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1290 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
40.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
58
SM Count
-
7424
Shading Units
384
232
TMUs
32
80
ROPs
8
232
Tensor Cores
-
58
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
48 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

133.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
386.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
24.72 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
24.72 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
386.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

110W
TDP
32W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
N13P-GS
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.9
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net