NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max Q Refresh

VS

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max Q Refresh

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2070 Max Q Refresh to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages

Released 3 years late

Boost Clock has increased by 48% (1665MHz vs 1125MHz)

More VRAM (12GB vs 8GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 352.0GB/s)

5120 additional rendering cores

Lower TDP (110W vs 115W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation +376%

24.72 TFLOPS

GeForce RTX 2070 Max Q Refresh

5.184 TFLOPS

Blender

RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation +112%

5296

GeForce RTX 2070 Max Q Refresh

2489

RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation

VS

GeForce RTX 2070 Max Q Refresh

Graphics Card

Mar 2023

Release Date

Mar 2020

Quadro Ada-M

Generation

GeForce 20 Mobile

Mobile

Type

Mobile

PCIe 4.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1290 MHz

Base Clock

900 MHz

1665 MHz

Boost Clock

1125 MHz

2250 MHz

Memory Clock

1375 MHz

Memory

12GB

Memory Size

8GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR6

192bit

Memory Bus

256bit

432.0GB/s

Bandwidth

352.0GB/s

Render Config

58

SM Count

36

-

Compute Units

-

7424

Shading Units

2304

232

TMUs

144

80

ROPs

64

232

Tensor Cores

288

58

RT Cores

36

128 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

64 KB (per SM)

48 MB

L2 Cache

4 MB

Theoretical Performance

133.2 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

72.00 GPixel/s

386.3 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

162.0 GTexel/s

24.72 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

10.37 TFLOPS

24.72 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

5.184 TFLOPS

386.3 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

162.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD104

GPU Name

TU106B

-

GPU Variant

-

Ada Lovelace

Architecture

Turing

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

5 nm

Process Size

12 nm

35.8 billion

Transistors

10.8 billion

294 mm²

Die Size

445 mm²

Board Design

110W

TDP

115W

-

Suggested PSU

-

Portable Device Dependent

Outputs

No outputs

None

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

8.9

CUDA

7.5

6.7

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation

2

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

3

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation

4

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon RX 470 Mobile

5

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon RX 6700S

6

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon HD 7750M

7

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon RX 7600S

8

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH

9

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon HD 6970M Mac Edition

10

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

Related News

1

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

2

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

3

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

4

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

5

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

6

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

7

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

8

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

9

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

10

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD