NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation vs NVIDIA P106M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM P106M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 29% (1665MHz vs 1291MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
6272 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA P106M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 110W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation
+731%
24.72 TFLOPS
P106M
2.974 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2019
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Mining GPUs
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1290 MHz
Base Clock
1291 MHz
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
1291 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.13GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
58
SM Count
9
7424
Shading Units
1152
232
TMUs
72
80
ROPs
32
232
Tensor Cores
-
58
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
133.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
41.31 GPixel/s
386.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.95 GTexel/s
24.72 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
46.48 GFLOPS
24.72 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.974 TFLOPS
386.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.95 GFLOPS
Board Design
110W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
GP106
-
GPU Variant
GP106-505-KC-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
16 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
6.1
6.7
Shader Model
6.8
