NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon E9172 MXM
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM Radeon E9172 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 37% (1665MHz vs 1219MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
6912 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon E9172 MXM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 110W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation
+1880%
24.72 TFLOPS
Radeon E9172 MXM
1.248 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Oct 2017
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1290 MHz
Base Clock
1124 MHz
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
48.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
58
SM Count
-
7424
Shading Units
512
232
TMUs
32
80
ROPs
16
232
Tensor Cores
-
58
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
48 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
133.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
386.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
24.72 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
24.72 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
386.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS
Board Design
110W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
Lexa
-
GPU Variant
E9170
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
5 nm
Process Size
14 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.4
