NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R7 A260
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 A260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 70% (1665MHz vs 980MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
7040 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation
+3187%
24.72 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 A260
0.752 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2014
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
All-In-One
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1290 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
980 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
58
SM Count
-
7424
Shading Units
384
232
TMUs
24
80
ROPs
8
232
Tensor Cores
-
58
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
48 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
133.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.840 GPixel/s
386.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.52 GTexel/s
24.72 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
24.72 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
752.6 GFLOPS
386.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
110W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
Topaz
-
GPU Variant
Topaz XT
(216-0858020)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
1.55 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
125 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5
