CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro CX
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro CX
VS
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
NVIDIA Quadro CX
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (280.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
5952 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
+4049%
19.17 TFLOPS
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
VS
Quadro CX
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro Ada
Generation
Quadro CX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
720 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
20GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
160bit
Memory Bus
384bit
280.0GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
48
SM Count
24
-
Compute Units
-
6144
Shading Units
192
192
TMUs
64
80
ROPs
24
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
192 KB
Theoretical Performance
124.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
299.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
19.17 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.17 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
299.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Board Design
70W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA RTX A4500 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
2
NVIDIA A100 PCIe vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
4
NVIDIA L4 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
5
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX A4000
6
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA A10 PCIe
7
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 vs NVIDIA Quadro CX
8
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
9
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX A4000
10
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro P500 Mobile
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy