Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (280.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
6032 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 78W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation +6746%
19.17 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3700
0.28 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2008
Quadro Ada
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

720 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
160bit
Memory Bus
256bit
280.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

48
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
6144
Shading Units
112
192
TMUs
56
80
ROPs
16
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

124.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
299.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
19.17 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.17 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
280.0 GFLOPS
299.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
G92-875-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Board Design

70W
TDP
78W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy