Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and 3GB VRAM Quadro K4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (280.0GB/s vs 134.8GB/s)
5376 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation +1440%
19.17 TFLOPS
Quadro K4000
1.244 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro Ada
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

720 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1404 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
160bit
Memory Bus
192bit
280.0GB/s
Bandwidth
134.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
48
SM Count
-
6144
Shading Units
768
192
TMUs
64
80
ROPs
24
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
48 MB
L2 Cache
384 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

124.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.96 GPixel/s
299.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
19.17 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.17 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1244 GFLOPS
299.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
51.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
80W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
GK106
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.9
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy