NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI25
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and 16GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI25 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (1746MHz vs 1500MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.02TB/s vs 436.2GB/s)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 's Advantages
256 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
+9%
13.41 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI25
12.29 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2018
Release Date
Jun 2017
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1200 MHz
Base Clock
1400 MHz
1746 MHz
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
852 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2
Memory Type
HBM2
4096bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
1.02TB/s
Bandwidth
436.2GB/s
Render Config
60
Compute Units
64
48
SM Count
-
3840
Shading Units
4096
240
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
64
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
111.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
419.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
384.0 GTexel/s
26.82 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
24.58 TFLOPS
13.41 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.29 TFLOPS
6.705 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
300W
700 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Vega 20
GPU Name
Vega 10
Vega 20 GLXT
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT GL
(215-0894124)
GCN 5.1
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
7 nm
Process Size
14 nm
13.23 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
331 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.4
