NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Tesla M6
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and 8GB VRAM Tesla M6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 48% (1746MHz vs 1180MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.02TB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla M6 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
+269%
13.41 TFLOPS
Tesla M6
3.625 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
+245%
10406
Tesla M6
3008
Graphics Card
Nov 2018
Release Date
Aug 2015
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1200 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
1746 MHz
Boost Clock
1180 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1.02TB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s
Render Config
60
Compute Units
-
48
SM Count
-
3840
Shading Units
1536
240
TMUs
96
64
ROPs
64
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
111.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.52 GPixel/s
419.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
113.3 GTexel/s
26.82 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.41 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.625 TFLOPS
6.705 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
113.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
100W
700 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Vega 20
GPU Name
GM204
Vega 20 GLXT
GPU Variant
GM204-995-A1
GCN 5.1
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
13.23 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
331 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
5.2
6.7
Shader Model
6.4
