NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation vs Intel Arc Pro A30M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM Arc Pro A30M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (2025MHz vs 2000MHz)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation
+102%
8.294 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A30M
4.096 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
2025 MHz
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
8
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
64.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
129.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
8.294 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
8.294 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
129.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
6 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
