Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro W6170M

NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro W6170M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM FirePro W6170M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock2025MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation +320%
8.294 TFLOPS
FirePro W6170M
1.971 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2014
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
2025 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
14
2048
Shading Units
896
64
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
16
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

64.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.60 GPixel/s
129.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
61.60 GTexel/s
8.294 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.294 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.971 TFLOPS
129.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
123.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Emerald
-
GPU Variant
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Board Design

35W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy