Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro M2000

NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro M2000

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2025MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1568 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation +1627%
8.294 TFLOPS
FirePro M2000
0.48 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Jul 2012
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
2025 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
16
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
480
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.000 GPixel/s
129.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.00 GTexel/s
8.294 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.294 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
129.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

35W
TDP
33W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Turks
-
GPU Variant
Turks GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy