Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation vs NVIDIA NVS 2100M

NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation vs NVIDIA NVS 2100M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM NVS 2100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2025MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
2032 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 2100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (11W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation +21166%
8.294 TFLOPS
NVS 2100M
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Jan 2010
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
NVS Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
2025 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
2
2048
Shading Units
16
64
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.140 GPixel/s
129.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.280 GTexel/s
8.294 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.294 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
129.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

35W
TDP
11W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
GT218
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy