Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation vs NVIDIA P106M

NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation vs NVIDIA P106M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM P106M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2025MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation +178%
8.294 TFLOPS
P106M
2.974 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Jan 2019
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Mining GPUs
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
2025 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.13GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
9
2048
Shading Units
1152
64
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
32
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
41.31 GPixel/s
129.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.95 GTexel/s
8.294 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
46.48 GFLOPS
8.294 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.974 TFLOPS
129.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.95 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
GP106
-
GPU Variant
GP106-505-KC-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
16 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
6.1
6.7
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy