Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 81% (2550MHz vs 1410MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
8320 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 576.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Ada Generation +416%
65.28 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX
12.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Sep 2021
Quadro Ada
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

1155 MHz
Base Clock
1140 MHz
2550 MHz
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
100
SM Count
70
12800
Shading Units
4480
400
TMUs
280
176
ROPs
128
400
Tensor Cores
280
100
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
72 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

448.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
1020 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
65.28 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
65.28 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
1020 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
250W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
GA100
AD102
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
7 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
8.0
6.7
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy