NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs ATI FireGL V8650
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 16 years late
Boost Clock2550MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
12480 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
+14736%
65.28 TFLOPS
FireGL V8650
0.44 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Aug 2007
Quadro Ada
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1155 MHz
Base Clock
-
2550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR4
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
100
SM Count
-
12800
Shading Units
320
400
TMUs
16
176
ROPs
16
400
Tensor Cores
-
100
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
72 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
448.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
1020 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
65.28 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
65.28 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
1020 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
Unknown
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
R600
AD102
GPU Variant
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
80 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
