NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 630 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2550MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
12608 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
+19328%
65.28 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 630 OEM
0.336 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Apr 2012
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1155 MHz
Base Clock
-
2550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
100
SM Count
-
12800
Shading Units
192
400
TMUs
16
176
ROPs
16
400
Tensor Cores
-
100
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
72 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
448.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.500 GPixel/s
1020 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.00 GTexel/s
65.28 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
65.28 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
336.0 GFLOPS
1020 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
14.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
50W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
GK107
AD102
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.9
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
