Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM GeForce 205 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2550MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
12784 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Ada Generation +144966%
65.28 TFLOPS
GeForce 205 OEM
0.045 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Nov 2009
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1155 MHz
Base Clock
-
2550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
100
SM Count
2
12800
Shading Units
16
400
TMUs
8
176
ROPs
4
400
Tensor Cores
-
100
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
72 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

448.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
1020 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
65.28 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
65.28 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
1020 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
31W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
GT218
AD102
GPU Variant
GT218-200-B1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy