NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock2550MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 134.4GB/s)
12288 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 375W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
+5955%
65.28 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
1.078 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1155 MHz
Base Clock
-
2550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
134.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
100
SM Count
16
12800
Shading Units
512
400
TMUs
64
176
ROPs
48
400
Tensor Cores
-
100
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
72 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
448.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.86 GPixel/s
1020 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.73 GTexel/s
65.28 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
65.28 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1078 GFLOPS
1020 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
375W
600 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
GF100
AD102
GPU Variant
GF100-ES-DT1-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
