NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM

VS

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages

Released 6 years and 9 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 144% (2550MHz vs 1046MHz)

More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 211.2GB/s)

11456 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM 's Advantages

Lower TDP (170W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

RTX 5000 Ada Generation +2221%

65.28 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 760 OEM

2.812 TFLOPS

Blender

RTX 5000 Ada Generation +3890%

7981

GeForce GTX 760 OEM

200

OctaneBench

RTX 5000 Ada Generation +2166%

816

GeForce GTX 760 OEM

36

RTX 5000 Ada Generation

VS

GeForce GTX 760 OEM

Graphics Card

Aug 2023

Release Date

Nov 2016

Quadro Ada

Generation

GeForce 700

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 4.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1155 MHz

Base Clock

993 MHz

2550 MHz

Boost Clock

1046 MHz

2250 MHz

Memory Clock

1650 MHz

Memory

32GB

Memory Size

2GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR5

256bit

Memory Bus

256bit

576.0GB/s

Bandwidth

211.2GB/s

Render Config

100

SM Count

-

Compute Units

-

12800

Shading Units

1344

400

TMUs

112

176

ROPs

32

400

Tensor Cores

-

100

RT Cores

-

128 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

16 KB (per SMX)

72 MB

L2 Cache

512 KB

Theoretical Performance

448.8 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

29.29 GPixel/s

1020 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

117.2 GTexel/s

65.28 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

-

65.28 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

2.812 TFLOPS

1020 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

117.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD102

GPU Name

GK104

AD102

GPU Variant

-

Ada Lovelace

Architecture

Kepler

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

5 nm

Process Size

28 nm

76.3 billion

Transistors

3.54 billion

609 mm²

Die Size

294 mm²

Board Design

250W

TDP

170W

600 W

Suggested PSU

450 W

4x DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2

1x 16-pin

Power Connectors

2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 (11_0)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.1

8.9

CUDA

3.0

6.7

Shader Model

5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

2

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

3

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

4

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon HD 5490

5

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

6

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100

7

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

8

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA NVS 310

9

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti OEM

10

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon X1650 GTO

Related News

1

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

2

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

3

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

4

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

5

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

6

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

7

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

8

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

9

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

10

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance