Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA NVS 300

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA NVS 300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM NVS 300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2550MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
12784 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Ada Generation +167284%
65.28 TFLOPS
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Jan 2011
Quadro Ada
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1155 MHz
Base Clock
-
2550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s

Render Config

100
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
12800
Shading Units
16
400
TMUs
8
176
ROPs
4
400
Tensor Cores
-
100
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
72 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

448.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
1020 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
65.28 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
65.28 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
1020 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
GT218
AD102
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
18W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy