NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX A4000H
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation and 16GB VRAM RTX A4000H to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 63% (2550MHz vs 1560MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
6656 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A4000H 's Advantages
Lower TDP (140W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
+240%
65.28 TFLOPS
RTX A4000H
19.17 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro Ada
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1155 MHz
Base Clock
735 MHz
2550 MHz
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
100
SM Count
48
12800
Shading Units
6144
400
TMUs
192
176
ROPs
96
400
Tensor Cores
192
100
RT Cores
48
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
72 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
448.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
149.8 GPixel/s
1020 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
299.5 GTexel/s
65.28 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
19.17 TFLOPS
65.28 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.17 TFLOPS
1020 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
299.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
140W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
GA104
AD102
GPU Variant
GA104-???-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
5 nm
Process Size
8 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.6
6.7
Shader Model
6.7
