Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA T400

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA T400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM T400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 79% (2550MHz vs 1425MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
12416 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA T400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Ada Generation +5867%
65.28 TFLOPS
T400
1.094 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
May 2021
Quadro Ada
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1155 MHz
Base Clock
420 MHz
2550 MHz
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

100
SM Count
6
-
Compute Units
-
12800
Shading Units
384
400
TMUs
24
176
ROPs
16
400
Tensor Cores
-
100
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
72 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

448.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
1020 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
65.28 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
65.28 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
1020 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
TU117
AD102
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
30W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy