Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock2115MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 60.80GB/s)
9616 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 120W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation +13260%
41.15 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260M
0.308 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Mar 2009
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 200M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1425 MHz
Base Clock
-
2115 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
950 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
60.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
76
SM Count
14
9728
Shading Units
112
304
TMUs
56
112
ROPs
16
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
64 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

236.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.800 GPixel/s
643.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.80 GTexel/s
41.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
41.15 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
308.0 GFLOPS
643.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

120W
TDP
65W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD103
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
N10E-GT
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy