NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 vs Intel Arc Pro A30M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 and 4GB VRAM Arc Pro A30M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
8704 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc Pro A30M 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 19% (2000MHz vs 1680MHz)
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
+698%
32.69 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A30M
4.096 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
1680 MHz
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
76
SM Count
-
9728
Shading Units
1024
304
TMUs
64
112
ROPs
32
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
8
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
64 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
188.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
510.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
32.69 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
32.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
510.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
6 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.6
