NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 and 256MB VRAM GeForce 9300M G to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
9712 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
+125630%
32.69 TFLOPS
GeForce 9300M G
0.026 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Feb 2008
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 9M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1680 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
76
SM Count
2
9728
Shading Units
16
304
TMUs
8
112
ROPs
4
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
64 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
188.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
510.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
32.69 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
32.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.60 GFLOPS
510.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
13W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
G86
-
GPU Variant
NB9M-GS1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
80 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.8
Shader Model
4.0
