NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 vs AMD Radeon E6460
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 and 512MB VRAM Radeon E6460 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
9568 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon E6460 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
+16926%
32.69 TFLOPS
Radeon E6460
0.192 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Apr 2011
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1680 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
76
SM Count
-
9728
Shading Units
160
304
TMUs
8
112
ROPs
4
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
64 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
188.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
510.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
32.69 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
32.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
510.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
Caicos
-
GPU Variant
E6460
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
0.37 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.0
