NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 vs AMD Radeon Pro 450
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 and 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro 450 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 81.28GB/s)
9088 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro 450 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
+3092%
32.69 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 450
1.024 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1680 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
81.28GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
76
SM Count
-
9728
Shading Units
640
304
TMUs
40
112
ROPs
16
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
188.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.80 GPixel/s
510.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.00 GTexel/s
32.69 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1024 GFLOPS
32.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1024 GFLOPS
510.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
64.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
Baffin
-
GPU Variant
Baffin LE
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
5 nm
Process Size
14 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
3 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.4
