NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 174.7GB/s)
7936 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
+993%
32.69 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
2.989 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
May 2015
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1680 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
28
76
SM Count
-
9728
Shading Units
1792
304
TMUs
112
112
ROPs
32
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
64 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
188.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.69 GPixel/s
510.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.41 GTexel/s
32.69 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
32.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.989 TFLOPS
510.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
373.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
250W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
Amethyst
-
GPU Variant
Amethyst PRO
(216-0872004)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
5 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.3
