Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs Intel Arc A350M

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs Intel Arc A350M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Max Q Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM Arc A350M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 46% (1680MHz vs 1150MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
8960 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A350M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 120W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Max Q Ada Generation +1751%
32.69 TFLOPS
Arc A350M
1.766 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1680 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
76
SM Count
-
9728
Shading Units
768
304
TMUs
48
112
ROPs
24
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
6
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
64 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

188.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.60 GPixel/s
510.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.20 GTexel/s
32.69 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.533 TFLOPS
32.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.766 TFLOPS
510.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
441.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

120W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD103
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
6 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy