Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro M8900

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro M8900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Max Q Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
8768 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 120W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Max Q Ada Generation +2403%
32.69 TFLOPS
FirePro M8900
1.306 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Apr 2011
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1680 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

76
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
12
9728
Shading Units
960
304
TMUs
48
112
ROPs
32
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
64 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

188.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.76 GPixel/s
510.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.64 GTexel/s
32.69 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
32.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1306 GFLOPS
510.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

AD103
GPU Name
Blackcomb
-
GPU Variant
Blackcomb XT GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
1.7 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Board Design

120W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy