Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Max Q Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
9704 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 120W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Max Q Ada Generation +61579%
32.69 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 320M
0.053 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Mar 2010
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 300M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1680 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s

Render Config

76
SM Count
3
-
Compute Units
-
9728
Shading Units
24
304
TMUs
8
112
ROPs
8
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
64 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

188.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.000 GPixel/s
510.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
32.69 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
32.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.80 GFLOPS
510.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

AD103
GPU Name
GT216
-
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

120W
TDP
23W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy