Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Max Q Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 755M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 86.40GB/s)
9344 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 120W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Max Q Ada Generation +4241%
32.69 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 755M
0.753 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 700M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1680 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
86.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
76
SM Count
-
9728
Shading Units
384
304
TMUs
32
112
ROPs
16
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

188.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.840 GPixel/s
510.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.36 GTexel/s
32.69 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
32.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
752.6 GFLOPS
510.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.36 GFLOPS

Board Design

120W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD103
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GT 755M
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.9
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy