Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Max Q Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 62% (1680MHz vs 1038MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
9344 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 120W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Max Q Ada Generation +4001%
32.69 TFLOPS
GeForce MX250
0.797 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
937 MHz
1680 MHz
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
76
SM Count
3
9728
Shading Units
384
304
TMUs
24
112
ROPs
16
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
64 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

188.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.61 GPixel/s
510.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.91 GTexel/s
32.69 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.46 GFLOPS
32.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
797.2 GFLOPS
510.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.91 GFLOPS

Board Design

120W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD103
GPU Name
GP108B
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
5 nm
Process Size
14 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
6.1
6.7
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy