Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA NVS 5400M

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA NVS 5400M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Max Q Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM NVS 5400M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
9632 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 5400M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 120W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Max Q Ada Generation +12820%
32.69 TFLOPS
NVS 5400M
0.253 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
NVS Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1680 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
76
SM Count
2
9728
Shading Units
96
304
TMUs
16
112
ROPs
4
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

188.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.640 GPixel/s
510.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.56 GTexel/s
32.69 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
32.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
253.4 GFLOPS
510.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
21.12 GFLOPS

Board Design

120W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD103
GPU Name
GF108
-
GPU Variant
N13P-NS1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy