CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GS
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GS
VS
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded
NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GS
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8600M GS to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2115MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
9712 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GS 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 120W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded
+141796%
41.15 TFLOPS
GeForce 8600M GS
0.029 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded
VS
GeForce 8600M GS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
May 2007
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 8M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II
Clock Speeds
1425 MHz
Base Clock
-
2115 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
76
SM Count
1
-
Compute Units
-
9728
Shading Units
16
304
TMUs
8
112
ROPs
4
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
64 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
236.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.800 GPixel/s
643.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.600 GTexel/s
41.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
41.15 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
28.80 GFLOPS
643.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
G86
-
GPU Variant
G86-770-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
80 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²
Board Design
120W
TDP
20W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
2
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded vs NVIDIA GeForce 410M
3
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded vs AMD Radeon RX 5600M
4
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation
5
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded vs AMD Radeon Pro 570
6
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded vs NVIDIA GeForce 910M
7
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M
8
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max Q
9
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded vs AMD Radeon HD 6530M
10
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded vs AMD Radeon HD 7510M
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy