Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 230 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
18128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada Generation +58271%
91.06 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 230
0.156 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2022
Release Date
Oct 2009
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

915 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
142
SM Count
6
18176
Shading Units
48
568
TMUs
24
192
ROPs
16
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
156.0 GFLOPS
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
75W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
G94B
AD102
GPU Variant
G94-300-B1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.8
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy