Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada Generation and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GT 230 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 24.00GB/s)
18080 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada Generation +37841%
91.06 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 230 OEM
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2022
Release Date
Apr 2009
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

915 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
24.00GB/s

Render Config

142
SM Count
12
-
Compute Units
-
18176
Shading Units
96
568
TMUs
48
192
ROPs
12
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
48 KB

Theoretical Performance

481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.000 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
G92B
AD102
GPU Variant
G92-159-B1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
4 nm
Process Size
55 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
608 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
75W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy