Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
VS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada Generation and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 672.3GB/s)
9728 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 4% (2610MHz vs 2505MHz)
Lower TDP (285W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada Generation +106%
91.06 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
44.1 TFLOPS
Blender
RTX 6000 Ada Generation +43%
11394
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
7921
OctaneBench
RTX 6000 Ada Generation +24%
1068
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
856
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
VS
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

Graphics Card

Dec 2022
Release Date
Jan 2024
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

915 MHz
Base Clock
2340 MHz
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
2610 MHz
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6X
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
672.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
142
SM Count
66
18176
Shading Units
8448
568
TMUs
264
192
ROPs
96
568
Tensor Cores
264
142
RT Cores
66
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
96 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
250.6 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
689.0 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
44.10 TFLOPS
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.10 TFLOPS
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
689.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
285W
700 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
AD103
AD102
GPU Variant
AD103-275-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
5 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.9
6.8
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

1
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon HD 7750
2
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 545 OEM
3
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM
4
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 OEM
5
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs ATI FirePro V7760
6
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon X1600 XT Dual
7
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon RX 460
8
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2
9
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
10
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100

Related News

1
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
2
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
3
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
4
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
5
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
6
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
7
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
8
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
9
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
10
Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game
© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy