NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada Generation and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
15872 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
+1489%
91.06 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
5.728 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2022
Release Date
Apr 2017
Quadro Ada
Generation
Radeon Pro GCN
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
915 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
36
142
SM Count
-
18176
Shading Units
2304
568
TMUs
144
192
ROPs
32
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
96 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.728 TFLOPS
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
250W
700 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
Ellesmere
AD102
GPU Variant
Ellesmere Gemini GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
5 nm
Process Size
14 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.7
