NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada vs ATI FireGL V3600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada and 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
18056 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada
+63136%
91.06 TFLOPS
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2022
Release Date
Jun 2007
Quadro Ada
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
915 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
3
142
SM Count
-
18176
Shading Units
120
568
TMUs
8
192
ROPs
4
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
300W
TDP
73W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
RV630
AD102
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
4.0
