Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada vs ATI FirePro V3750

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada vs ATI FirePro V3750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
17856 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3750 's Advantages
Lower TDP (48W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada +25769%
91.06 TFLOPS
FirePro V3750
0.352 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2022
Release Date
Sep 2008
Quadro Ada
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

915 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
142
SM Count
-
18176
Shading Units
320
568
TMUs
32
192
ROPs
8
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
96 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
352.0 GFLOPS
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
48W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
RV730
AD102
GPU Variant
RV730 PRO (215-0719056)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy