NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 690 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 146% (2505MHz vs 1019MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
16640 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada
+2809%
91.06 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 690
3.13 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2022
Release Date
May 2012
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
915 MHz
Base Clock
915 MHz
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
1019 MHz
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
142
SM Count
-
18176
Shading Units
1536
568
TMUs
128
192
ROPs
32
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
96 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.61 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
130.4 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.130 TFLOPS
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
130.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
300W
700 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
3x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
GK104
AD102
GPU Variant
GK104-355-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.9
CUDA
3.0
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
