Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada vs AMD FirePro W7000

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada vs AMD FirePro W7000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada and 4GB VRAM FirePro W7000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
16896 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W7000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada +3644%
91.06 TFLOPS
FirePro W7000
2.432 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2022
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro Ada
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

915 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
153.6GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
142
SM Count
-
18176
Shading Units
1280
568
TMUs
80
192
ROPs
32
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
96 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.00 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.432 TFLOPS
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
152.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
150W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
Pitcairn
AD102
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy